<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ikea Has Outraged “Fontheads”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hiledesign.com/ikea-has-outraged-%e2%80%9cfontheads%e2%80%9d/913/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hiledesign.com/ikea-has-outraged-%e2%80%9cfontheads%e2%80%9d/913/</link>
	<description>Hile Design&#039;s advertising, design and fun blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monica Getz</title>
		<link>http://blog.hiledesign.com/ikea-has-outraged-%e2%80%9cfontheads%e2%80%9d/913/comment-page-1/#comment-4976</link>
		<dc:creator>Monica Getz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hiledesign.com/?p=913#comment-4976</guid>
		<description>After reading a preview of Dave&#039;s post, a Hile staffer (who shall remain nameless) made the innocent comment, &quot;Don&#039;t people have better things to worry about than fonts?&quot; The rest of the Hile crew within earshot promptly launched into an impassioned, albeit brief, discussion about the very topic. In the previous version of Dave&#039;s post, he mentioned that &quot;we&quot; agreed with Ikea. Lindsey, our resident fontophile, promptly took issue:  Well, Dave, we don&#039;t necessarily agree with you, you know. After all, Verdana is a web font.

Julie: Yeah, Dave. I&#039;m not crazy about it, either.

Dave (startled at this lack of cohesiveness among the Hile team): Well, I didn&#039;t say I&#039;m in favor of Verdana being used any place Futura is used ...

Art: I went into Ikea and they had a sign with words on it in Verdana  as big as you ... It was ugly!

Me (I admit somewhat self-righteously, trying to show how I, as the office writer, am above the trivialities of font discussions): What&#039;s really important is what&#039;s written in the font, not the font itself.

Art: I can show you a dozen examples of when that&#039;s not true.

Alright, already. So, I guess we at Hile are a little opinionated about font usage. Sheesh! Granted, there are more important things in the world than Ikea&#039;s choice to use Verdana (they&#039;re paying the bill, after all), but we all have our hot buttons, and at least in this design-oriented office, typography tends to be one of them. Oh, and Dave? I like the way Verdana looks on our marketing letters, which is as close as I tend to get to it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading a preview of Dave&#8217;s post, a Hile staffer (who shall remain nameless) made the innocent comment, &#8220;Don&#8217;t people have better things to worry about than fonts?&#8221; The rest of the Hile crew within earshot promptly launched into an impassioned, albeit brief, discussion about the very topic. In the previous version of Dave&#8217;s post, he mentioned that &#8220;we&#8221; agreed with Ikea. Lindsey, our resident fontophile, promptly took issue:  Well, Dave, we don&#8217;t necessarily agree with you, you know. After all, Verdana is a web font.</p>
<p>Julie: Yeah, Dave. I&#8217;m not crazy about it, either.</p>
<p>Dave (startled at this lack of cohesiveness among the Hile team): Well, I didn&#8217;t say I&#8217;m in favor of Verdana being used any place Futura is used &#8230;</p>
<p>Art: I went into Ikea and they had a sign with words on it in Verdana  as big as you &#8230; It was ugly!</p>
<p>Me (I admit somewhat self-righteously, trying to show how I, as the office writer, am above the trivialities of font discussions): What&#8217;s really important is what&#8217;s written in the font, not the font itself.</p>
<p>Art: I can show you a dozen examples of when that&#8217;s not true.</p>
<p>Alright, already. So, I guess we at Hile are a little opinionated about font usage. Sheesh! Granted, there are more important things in the world than Ikea&#8217;s choice to use Verdana (they&#8217;re paying the bill, after all), but we all have our hot buttons, and at least in this design-oriented office, typography tends to be one of them. Oh, and Dave? I like the way Verdana looks on our marketing letters, which is as close as I tend to get to it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hile</title>
		<link>http://blog.hiledesign.com/ikea-has-outraged-%e2%80%9cfontheads%e2%80%9d/913/comment-page-1/#comment-4929</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hiledesign.com/?p=913#comment-4929</guid>
		<description>I should clarify that I am not recommending Verdana for use in headers and display fonts in print, but it holds up well at small sizes (like 9 pt) as a text font.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should clarify that I am not recommending Verdana for use in headers and display fonts in print, but it holds up well at small sizes (like 9 pt) as a text font.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://blog.hiledesign.com/ikea-has-outraged-%e2%80%9cfontheads%e2%80%9d/913/comment-page-1/#comment-4928</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hiledesign.com/?p=913#comment-4928</guid>
		<description>Glad you revised your postscript. Personally I disagree with Ikea&#039;s decision; Futura is a beautiful font and much more interesting for display. I&#039;m shuddering to think of their giant banners in Verdana now. Sadness. Verdana&#039;s not necessarily a bad font for print, but I think it&#039;s better used on-screen.

You&#039;d think they would have gone with some Swiss Typography…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you revised your postscript. Personally I disagree with Ikea&#8217;s decision; Futura is a beautiful font and much more interesting for display. I&#8217;m shuddering to think of their giant banners in Verdana now. Sadness. Verdana&#8217;s not necessarily a bad font for print, but I think it&#8217;s better used on-screen.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d think they would have gone with some Swiss Typography…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

